Saturday, September 15, 2012

Don't Mess With US

Happy Friday!  I am Lance Pisowicz and this is “What’s Wrong With Washington”.  I am happy to not only be back on my Friday blog but also thankful to have my Twitter account again.  I know I promised you guys an explanation on why my account was suspended all of last week and this week until Tuesday, so here I am.  As many of you are aware I post many photos, links, quotes, etc. on Twitter so you guys can enjoy them.  I never post ads for businesses or anything that does not pertain to my website, community, or life.  Apparently Twitter’s systems detected my account as a potential spam threat and suspended me.  I was told this happens from time to time but nevertheless my account was suspended.  I first noticed I was suspended on Labor Day afternoon and immediately sent Twitter an appeal request.  Within a few minutes an automated message directed me to send an email appeal to Twitter’s Support Staff.  I followed suit and emailed them requesting to know why I was suspended.  I was very professional and polite in my email, I’m sure all of you who are on Twitter can relate to my frustration, and the fact that I would have over 8,000 people wondering what happened to me only made matters worse.  Each day I waited for a reply from Twitter’s Support Staff until finally on Tuesday afternoon I received word that my account had been reinstated and concise apology for the mistaken suspension.  Quite the adventure right?  But the more I thought about the day I was reinstated on the more my frustration subsided.  To think that just eleven years earlier more than 3,000 innocent people had lost their lives, made me realize my situation was of little significance.  It feels good to be back, and I have just a couple of reminders before we begin.  Please do check out my website, Lance Pisowicz Online (www.wix.com/lancejp/online).  Also become a subscriber of my Youtube Channel (www.youtube.com/user/lancejponline), like my Facebook (www.facebook.com/lancepisowicz), or follow me on Twitter (www.twitter.com/lancejponline).  You can also subscribe to my blogs on blogger (www.wrongwithwashington.blogspot.com and www.lancesweeklywalk.blogspot.com).  It would be a pleasure for me and everyone else involved with Lance Pisowicz Online if you would join us there sometime.

Considering the magnitude of Tuesday’s September 11th anniversary I thought I would spend tonight’s blog paying my respects to the victims of another tragedy this past week. As many of you are aware, four Americans were killed in Libya in an attack on the U.S. Consulate.1

Among the victims were U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, and two former Navy SEALS.  If you understand foreign policy, you know that when a country has an embassy or in this case a consulate (somewhat like a junior embassy for lack of a better term) are considered property of the said country.  The land then does not belong to the country that surrounds the embassy but rather is part of the country the embassy represents.  Citizens of the surrounding country are not allowed inside or on the property of the said country’s embassy unless otherwise permitted by authorities from the represented country.

If a member of the surrounding country trespasses on the embassy’s property or worse enters the building it is considered invading the embassy’s country and an international offense.  This is considered an act of war even if violence is not involved at all.

In simple terms, the fact that four Americans were killed at a U.S. Consulate by Libyan citizens (although not officially supported by the Libyan government) was an act of war against the United States.  The question is, how should we respond?

Not let’s be rational, it would be ridiculous to start a war over a single issue like this, however, our stance toward Libya will certainly be more strenuous than it has been in the past.  There are talks of cutting off all foreign aid to Libya, and I believe that should only be our initial response.  I also think we should add Libya to our “watch” list as a potentially hostile nation. 

But it’s not just Libya we should keep an eye on.  There have been similar protester attacks aimed at Americans and the U.S. Embassies in Egypt and Yemen.  Should we even have supported the Arab Spring in the first place?

Don’t get me wrong, I believe democracy is the best form of human government there is.  After all God created us equal didn’t He?  No one man should have more say than another.  The problem is this Arab Spring is not a group of revolutions that follow in the footsteps of the American Revolution.  The Arab Spring is rather more reminiscent of the French Revolution of the 1790s, one of the bloodiest time periods in world history.  Instead of reason and decency being at the center of a government overhaul, mob rule and chaos run the show. 

I saw a photo on Facebook with a caption that goes like this:  “In 1986 a group of Libyans killed Americans.  In response, President Ronald Reagan bombed their leader’s house.  Libya remained quiet for almost twenty-five years.  Then someone apologized.”

In the past four years it has become increasingly apparent that President Obama’s idea of compromise and desire for reconciliation and love from America’s enemies has failed.  Foreign bullies have walked all over us and our friends.  Just look at the situation with the soon to be nuclear power of Iran.  We need a president who wants foreign countries to respect us before they “love” us.

While Hosni Mubarak and Muammar Gaddafi were highly corrupt and cruel to their people, they at least understood the boundaries of their foreign policy.  You don’t mess with US.

That will be it for us tonight.  I hope you have enjoyed our broadcast tonight, as much as I have.  Thanks again, and God bless you all.  I will see you all next Sunday.  Have a great weekend!



Sources:


  1. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/14/obama-clinton-to-attend-transfer-remains-ceremony-for-murdered-diplomats/

  1. http://www.foxnews.com/world/slideshow/2012/09/11/protesters-storm-us-embassy-in-cairo/#slide=1

Friday, August 10, 2012

Setting the Record Straight

Happy Friday!  I am Lance Pisowicz and this is “What’s Wrong With Washington”.  I’m glad to be back in the Chicagoland area after my family and I enjoyed our vacation in Florida.  Unfortunately due to the hectic schedule I have with school beginning on Wednesday I will not be presenting a blog on Sunday for Lance’s Weekly Walk.  I have just a couple of reminders before we begin.  Please do check out my website, Lance Pisowicz Online (www.wix.com/lancejp/online).  Also become a subscriber of my Youtube Channel (www.youtube.com/user/lancejponline), like my Facebook (www.facebook.com/lancepisowicz), or follow me on Twitter (www.twitter.com/lancejponline).  You can also subscribe to my blogs on blogger (www.wrongwithwashington.blogspot.com and www.lancesweeklywalk.blogspot.com).  It would be a pleasure for me and everyone else involved with Lance Pisowicz Online if you would join us there sometime.

I have two key topics I want to evaluate this evening that have been under the spotlight for the past couple of weeks.  The first story I would like to cover is one that absolutely erupted once I left town for the sunshine state.  In the recent weeks and months the public has watched numerous companies and organizations take sides in the same-sex marriage debate.  The first time I covered a subject like this I scorned Nabisco for posting a photo of a rainbow Oreo with the caption “Pride” on Oreo’s official Facebook page.  However, Nabisco was widely praised by the media for their “stand”.  Within the past couple of weeks Chick fil A has come under fire for supposedly opposing the rights of homosexuals.  These were just two of the companies mentioned in this media “field day”, so I’m here to set the record straight on who said what and exactly who was in the wrong.

A little over a week ago I posted a statement on Twitter which basically sums up my view on the topic.

“Funny how the left ignores my policy of businesses selling products not ideas until 1 takes the Conservative side. Good for Chick Fil A!” - July 30th

Does that make sense?  The mainstream media praised Nabisco for their view when they expressed it as a company, while all that happened with Chick fil A was that the CEO expressed his personal view.

To me, this shows a great deal of bias toward one side of a still quite controversial issue in American politics.  The idea that same-sex marriage is acceptable is not necessarily “the norm” right now.  There are those who believe in the idea of traditional marriage, and their viewpoints count no less than do those who accept homosexuality and want to push forward on same-sex “rights”.

I have nothing wrong with a person who wants to speak out and express his or her viewpoint as an individual.  I hold nothing against a public official who voices their view on the topic and makes it part of his/her campaign if that official will actually be in a position of power regarding that policy.

For example, I may not agree with Jeff Bezos and his viewpoint on same-sex marriage, but at least he distinguished his viewpoint from his companies.1  I treat him the same way I treat Dan Cathy, the CEO of Chick fil A (although I agree with Cathy’s viewpoint) since they did not pour their personal views into their company’s philosophy.2

I also would not have a problem with the governor of a state opposing same-sex marriage or supporting same-sex marriage since the policy is actually controlled at the state level.

Nabisco was in the wrong in my book.  They came out and released their view as a company.  Had Nabisco’s CEO or any other employee come out and expressed his/her viewpoint individually, I would show them the same respect I show Cathy and Bezos.  The problem with a company or organization taking a political stance is the fact that large corporations are so diverse, it is wrong to speak for everyone on a controversial issue like same-sex marriage.  While it is completely within their rights to do so, I would say that it is an ignorant business decision.  A business is supposed to sell a product or service, not a viewpoint or idea.

I also have a problem with is President Obama and the Democratic Party attempting to make same-sex marriage a policy platform on the national level.3  Marriage laws are determined on the state level so when a president, a senator, or a U.S. congressman attempts to gain votes using a state issue.  Leave the rights of the states to the states and leave the rights of the federal government to the federal government.  Do not go out and show blatant disregard for the Constitution.

To conclude this evening, I thought I’d revisit the Vice President drama that surrounds Mitt Romney and the Republican Party leading up to the Republican National Convention in Tampa at the end of the month.

I know all of the suspense has been quite exhausting for those of us watching the political landscape very closely in one of the most important election years in recent memory, but I’d say all of the publicity is a good thing.

It is good to have the country dreaming big on who might be America’s second in command, especially if their dream comes true or even if Romney’s choice exceeds their expectations.  The question is:  will we know who it is before the convention?

All of the reports I have been getting from my inside connections suggest that we will find out sometime this weekend.  Among the finalists I have heard the names Paul Ryan, Tim Pawlenty, Rob Portman, Bobby Jindal, Bob McDonnell, John Thune, and even Marco Rubio.

Word is that those who download Romney’s new iPhone and Android App, “MyMitt” will now before the general public.  However, I am hoping to get the insider info on who meets with Romney and the lucky winners of his most recent contest.  I will inform you all as I learn more.

That will be it for us tonight.  I hope you have enjoyed our broadcast tonight, as much as I have.  Thanks again, and God bless you all.  I will see you all next Friday.  Have a great weekend!



Sources:


  1. http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/amazon-ceo-25m-wash-gay-marriage-law-16889669#.UCW-951mREM

  1. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/08/01/chick-fil-supporters-plan-national-appreciation-day/

  1. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ap-us--democratic-convention-us/2012/08/09/03e8f25e-e275-11e1-89f7-76e23a982d06_story.html

Saturday, July 21, 2012

Who Built it Then?

Happy Friday!  I am Lance Pisowicz and this is “What’s Wrong With Washington”.  This will be the only edition of my Friday blog that I will present until August 10th after I have returned from my vacation to Florida.  I have just a couple of reminders before we begin.  Please do check out my website, Lance Pisowicz Online (www.wix.com/lancejp/online).  Also become a subscriber of my Youtube Channel (www.youtube.com/user/lancejponline), like my Facebook (www.facebook.com/lancepisowicz), or follow me on Twitter (www.twitter.com/lancejponline).  You can also subscribe to my blogs on blogger (www.wrongwithwashington.blogspot.com and www.lancesweeklywalk.blogspot.com).  It would be a pleasure for me and everyone else involved with Lance Pisowicz Online if you would join us there sometime.

I have a couple of key topics that I would like to highlight tonight, but for now I would like to take a moment to honor the victims of the Colorado movie theater shooting early Friday morning.  It saddens me to think that something as simple and innocent as going to see a movie can end in horror.  My thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families during this difficult time.  I also am confident in our judicial system that those responsible will be brought to justice, and that God will be glorified through the entire process.

To begin with our coverage for tonight, I would like to discuss something that has been blowing up my Twitter feed much of this week.  I have had the privilege of receiving insider information from a Mitt Romney campaign intern in regards to who his Vice President choice might be.  From what I have heard, the known finalists are Rob Portman (Senator from Ohio), Tim Pawlenty (former Minnesota Governor), and Bobby Jindal (Louisiana Governor).  I have also heard rumors about John Thune (Senator from South Dakota) possibly being the “dark horse” in the whole process.  Although, GOP favorites Marco Rubio (Senator from Florida), Paul Ryan (Congressman from Wisconsin), and Condoleezza Rice (former Secretary of State) might also surprise us as well.

Now that we’ve taken a look at the potential vice presidential candidates let’s take a look at the two guys who are running for president.  Both President Obama and Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney have been trading jabs in many different categories as the November elections approach.  One of the key battles has been over “you didn’t build that” remark President Obama made recently in regard to entrepreneurs and business owners.1  So I must ask the president:  Who built it then?

President Obama has claimed that the remark was aimed at showing that government has helped make business success possible.  However, Mitt Romney has said that the president’s remark was a direct insult to small business owners, entrepreneurs, and thinkers throughout the nation.

Some have called this statement a pivotal point in the 2012 elections, and it has played a role in Mitt Romney now leading President Obama 45-43 percent in a recent ABC News Poll according to Hannity on July 19th.2

Will statements like this, ever-increasing gas prices, and an 8.2 unemployment rate doom President Obama in November?  Only time will tell.

That will be it for us tonight.  For those of you wondering about the Ultimate Patriot competition and sweepstakes, I encourage you to visit the official website of the event at:  www.wix.com/lancejp/patriot for more information.  There you will find documents, links, a promo video, and a whole lot more.  By the way, the entire event is free and you have the opportunity to win a $25 Restaurants.com E-Gift Certificate if you participate.  I hope you’ll join us with that. 

I hope you have enjoyed our broadcast tonight, as much as I have.  Thanks again, and God bless you all.  I will see you one last time (Sunday) before I leave for my vacation in Florida.  Have a great weekend!



Sources:

  1. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/20/obama-calls-didnt-build-that-furor-bogus-as-romney-releases-new-ad/

  1. Hannity (7/19/12)

Friday, June 29, 2012

Who Spoke?

It’s the last Friday in the month of June!  I am Lance Pisowicz and this is “What’s Wrong With Washington”.  As I prepare for my trip to Alaska, I have been incredibly busy packing and studying for my responsibilities there.  I am very excited about my trip and actually have a meeting at tonight at the time that I normally prepare this blog.  So I am writing and recording this week’s edition prior to my meeting.  With that being said, I will spend most of my time this evening focusing on one key topic.  I have just a couple of reminders before we begin.  Please do check out my website, Lance Pisowicz Online (www.wix.com/lancejp/online).  Also become a subscriber of my Youtube Channel (www.youtube.com/user/lancejponline), like my Facebook (www.facebook.com/lancepisowicz), or follow me on Twitter (www.twitter.com/lancejponline).  You can also subscribe to my blogs on blogger (www.wrongwithwashington.blogspot.com and www.lancesweeklywalk.blogspot.com).  It would be a pleasure for me and everyone else involved with Lance Pisowicz Online if you would join us there sometime.

As I said in my opening, I will spend my time tonight on one main subject.  Sure I could analyze Oreo’s endorsement of same-sex marriage and offer my insight that a business sells a product and not an idea, but I think at this point we are all tired of hearing about this highly controversial issue.  The truth is, at the present time we all have more immediate issues to address.  We have millions of people out of work, an ever-growing national debt, and a health care system that not only goes against our founding principles but threatens to bankrupt our nation.  That last topic I mentioned will be what we will analyze this evening.

I am sure many of you are aware of what has been occurring in Washington these past few weeks.  The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that Obamacare was not unconstitutional.  Now reports are surfacing that there was a initially enough support to strike down the centerpiece of President Obama’s administration, but Chief Justice John Roberts flipped to support the law.  Why would the Chief Supreme Court Justice (who traditionally has been seen as one of the more conservative jurors) decide to take the liberal stance?

Regardless of John Robert’s motives for supporting the law in the end, the Supreme Court’s ruling will have a significant impact in the November elections.  Gone is the option for Democrats to promise a revised, more “center of the aisle” healthcare plan.  They are stuck with the plan they approved in March of 2010 which led to their heavy defeat in the 2010 mid-term elections.  Could we see a similar result in 2012?  I’d say history is more than likely to repeat itself.

According to a recent poll by Fox News, 83.11% of Americans say that they plan to elect lawmakers to repeal Obamacare rather than accept it and move on.1  After all, the president certainly cannot expect forgiveness if he hasn’t even apologized.

The opportunity for the president to act as though Republicans ruined his plan to provide better healthcare for the people is also gone with the Supreme Court’s upholding of the law.

With a significant level of public outrage over the decision rather than acceptance, a close race between Obama and Romney may be close no longer.  I’d expect to see a reasonable drop in President Obama’s approval ratings when the next poll is conducted.

Democrats now are forced to attempt to encourage the public that they should simply accept the Supreme Court’s ruling as the ultimate right.  But the fact is that the Supreme Court is simply just another branch of government.  The Judicial government is no more immune to public outrage than the Legislative or Executive branches.

The truth is the American people are the boss when it comes to government, and that includes all branches.  Unlike Wisconsin’s decision to retain Scott Walker as governor (a decision made by the people), the decision to uphold Obamacare was made by a group of jurors who have been permitted to retain their positions for life regardless of the people’s opinion of them.

In Washington, nine government officials spoke and stood for the left.  In Wisconsin, the people spoke and stood against the left.  In November I believe the people’s voice will mean a whole lot more.

That will be it for us tonight.  For those of you wondering about the Ultimate Patriot competition and sweepstakes, I encourage you to visit the official website of the event at:  www.wix.com/lancejp/patriot for more information.  There you will find documents, links, a promo video, and a whole lot more.  By the way, the entire event is free and you have the opportunity to win a $25 Restaurants.com E-Gift Certificate if you participate.  I hope you’ll join us with that.  Also, If you would like to have the opportunity to share your thoughts with me and all the viewers/readers of Lance Pisowicz Online, you can leave me a message/reply that might even be shared on the show, be sure to head over to:  http://lponline.wufoo.com/forms/z7x3k7/ to take part in that.  I will not be presenting a “Lance’s Weekly Walk” this Sunday since I will be at my family reunion.  I will return with another “What’s Wrong With Washington” next Friday.


To close with this evening, I have a message from one of our greater readers and viewers from the great state of Ohio and the city of Columbus.

“Not about the economy, never really was; rather the Constitution and freedoms for which we have struggled mightily.  Unborn citizens subjected to slaughter everyday, Catholics stripped of conscience protection in the name of “health” care.  Send those who love our Constitution to the Senate and White House!  VOTE-FIX WASHINGTON-REPAIR the USA!”

-Karen Kurfiss
Columbus, Ohio


I hope you have enjoyed our broadcast tonight, as much as I have.  Thanks again, and God bless you all.  I will see you one last time (Sunday) before I leave for my ten day trip to Alaska.  Have a great weekend!



Sources:

  1. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2012/you-decide/how-should-american-people-react-supreme-court-ruling-obamacare

Friday, June 22, 2012

A Win-Win Scenario

Happy Friday!  I am Lance Pisowicz and this is “What’s Wrong With Washington”.  Tonight’s blog will be significantly shorter since I have been busy preparing for my family reunion this weekend.  I have just a couple of reminders before we begin.  Please do check out my website, Lance Pisowicz Online (www.wix.com/lancejp/online).  Also become a subscriber of my Youtube Channel (www.youtube.com/user/lancejponline), like my Facebook (www.facebook.com/lancepisowicz), or follow me on Twitter (www.twitter.com/lancejponline).  You can also subscribe to my blogs on blogger (www.wrongwithwashington.blogspot.com) and (www.lancesweeklywalk.blogspot.com).  It would be a pleasure for me and everyone else involved with Lance Pisowicz Online if you would join us there sometime.

This evening I am going to focus on a small but important topic and analyze its effect in the November elections.  As many of you are aware both President Obama and Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney have been sparring on the issue of illegal immigration.  Here’s a quote from Mitt Romney from his speech at the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials conference in Orlando, Florida.

“We can find common ground here, and we must. We owe it to ourselves as Americans to ensure that our country remains a land of opportunity – both for those who were born here and for those who share our values, respect our laws, and want to come to our shores.”

I think that pretty much sums up his and the general Republican view on immigration.  Throughout history the Republican Party has carried a similar banner.  They have been the party that has stood for equality both for those who are new to our nation and those who became citizens by birth.

The Republican Party is a political organization formed by abolitionist like my fourth-great grandfather, Comfort Carpenter Walker who believed that all men were indeed created equal.  First men like him spoke out through politics by selecting Abraham Lincoln as their next President in 1860.  Then they spoke out through action by joining the Union army in an attempt not only to restore national unity but also to achieve the true meaning of a principle within the Declaration of Independence.

Some of these men even volunteered to fight without being drafted like my fourth great-grandfather, Comfort Carpenter Walker who joined the Wisconsin Volunteer Infantry (11th Regiment, Company D) when the war broke out.  He fought through 1861 and much of 1862 until he died at Camp Patterson in November of 1862 due to undisclosed illness.  Comfort left behind a wife and four children when he died at the age of 39 and like many men like him, was a hero to his family, his community, and his country.

As I prepare to gather with that same family at another of our biannual family reunions, I reflect on not only his life but also the lives of my other ancestors who poured their heart and soul into their family, their country, and their spiritual lives.

Today there are those who accuse the Republican Party of being the party of racism and discrimination, when in effect the Republicans are yet again the party who looks out for the well-being not of a special interest group but of the entire population.

A key element we must remember is that Mitt Romney and Conservatives are not against immigration.  They are against ILLEGAL immigration.  As I have said in previous blogs, I believe that immigration has been a terrific blessing to our nation throughout history.  Whether it was the English, Spanish, Dutch, and French who were the original immigrants to the New World, the Irish and Germans who came prior to the Civil War, or the Eastern and Southern Europeans who arrived at the turn of the 20th Century one thing is for certain.  Immigrants have contributed to our nation in many ways.

Now as we look to the more recent years of immigration, we realize that a greater number of people have been coming to America from Asia and Latin American nations.  In the same way, they have offered the United States great benefits.

However, we realize that failure to control our own borders sets us on a path to follow the path of fallen civilizations such as that of the Roman Empire.

What solution do I offer?  I think we should improve the defense of our border but create immigration centers similar to Ellis Island in convenient locations where the greatest numbers of immigrants are entering the United States.  It’s a win-win scenario for everyone.

If Mitt Romney is able to sell this to the Hispanic American population he will be hard to defeat in November.

That will be it for us tonight.  For those of you wondering about the Ultimate Patriot competition and sweepstakes, I encourage you to visit the official website of the event at:  www.wix.com/lancejp/patriot for more information.  There you will find documents, links, a promo video, and a whole lot more.  By the way, the entire event is free and you have the opportunity to win a $25 Restaurants.com E-Gift Certificate if you participate.  I hope you’ll join us with that.  Also, If you would like to have the opportunity to share your thoughts with me and all the viewers/readers of Lance Pisowicz Online, you can leave me a message/reply that might even be shared on the show, be sure to head over to:  http://lponline.wufoo.com/forms/z7x3k7/ to take part in that.  I will not be presenting a “Lance’s Weekly Walk” this Sunday since I will be at my family reunion.  I will return with another “What’s Wrong With Washington” next Friday.

I hope you have enjoyed our broadcast tonight, as much as I have.  Thanks again, and God bless you all.  See you next week!

Friday, June 15, 2012

Returning to Our Roots

Happy Friday!  I am Lance Pisowicz and this is “What’s Wrong With Washington”.  I hope you had a great week and are looking forward to an even better weekend.  Tonight I will be discussing one key topic that I think holds very true for all Americans.  I have just a couple of reminders before we begin.  Please do check out my website, Lance Pisowicz Online (www.wix.com/lancejp/online).  Also become a subscriber of my Youtube Channel (www.youtube.com/user/lancejponline), like my Facebook (www.facebook.com/lancepisowicz), or follow me on Twitter (www.twitter.com/lancejponline).  You can also subscribe to my blogs on blogger (www.wrongwithwashington.blogspot.com and www.lancesweeklywalk.blogspot.com).  It would be a pleasure for me and everyone else involved with Lance Pisowicz Online if you would join us there sometime.

Tonight I am going to focus on the topic of patriotism and national pride which I think offers a solution to many of the trials our nation faces today.  Most of you already know this, but just for the record:  I will not be holding any weekly polls while the Ultimate Patriot Competition and Sweepstakes in the months of June and July.  For those of you who do not know what the Ultimate Patriot event is, be sure to pay extra attention at the end of the program for details regarding it all.

A have been asked by several people why I am even holding an Ultimate Patriot event this summer.  I mean, why is it so significant to have such a competition?

Although it is fun to hold a competition and giving away a prize to someone is always enjoyable, neither reason was the deciding factor for me when I chose to host this event.

Some of the hardest times in our nation’s history have followed periods in which patriotism became distilled and being an American wasn’t held in the position of honor it should have been.

Just like in the years before the Civil War, or the “Roaring Twenties”, or the Jimmy Carter era we forgot who we were.

The same occurred in the years before our recent recession in which we became so obsessed with money, social status, and our own personal desires that we abandoned what truly brought us all together.

We began to focus on social issues that divided us and began to disrespect one another as a result.  I believe it takes a person of character who can not only discuss and attempt to resolve such controversial issues, but also treat both sides with the respect they deserve.

We need to remember that these individuals are human beings whether they agree with us or not.  They are not demons, or evil spirits who seek only to destroy us.  They support their cause because they genuinely believe in it.

So if we want to support innocent life from the moment of conception by passing an abortion ban or support the sanctity of marriage between one man and one woman through defining marriage as it should be, we need to be the first to reach with an outstretched hand willing to cooperate with those who think differently than us, without compromising our core values.

As I said in the beginning, a lot of our issues today could be solved if Americans were more united behind issues that affect us all.  Nearly all of us can agree that the economy is struggling, but we are divided over how we should go about fixing it.

So why don’t we all look at our nation’s blueprint, the Constitution.  America was meant to be a Capitalist nation not a nation in which the government can regulate business and the lives of individual people.

In a war situation, we must unite behind our men and women in the armed forces, regardless of whether we agree with the reasons behind the war or not.  One way we could be more united in supporting a war effort would be to only get involved in wars that will have a profound effect on America’s interests.  We then could offer a World War II effort in select wars as compared to offering a Vietnam effort in many wars.

To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, let’s remember that we are one nation under God and not a nation gone under.  Whether we choose to follow the Christian faith or not, we must all recognize that its principles were present in the founding of our nation and that those same principles offer solutions to current issues.

Above all, as I have restated several times this evening, we must remember to respect one another and our differences.  The diversity in our nation is what makes us so great.  The United States of America may have been founded by Christians but it was not founded by theocrats.

When you have the opportunity to show patriotism, show it.  Whether it is reciting the pledge of allegiance, removing your cap during the nation anthem, flying your flag on Independence Day, or simply loving your countrymen, take pride in the United States and all it stands for.

Before we conclude tonight I would like to share a message I received from one of our readers and viewers:

“If my great grandfather were still alive, he wouldn't recognize this country. He came here from Italy to start his own business, and now my father can't do business because of regulations that tells him what he can and can't do on his own private land. Ridiculous.”
- Stephen Calandrino 
Middletown, New Jersey

That will be it for us tonight.  For those of you wondering about the Ultimate Patriot competition and sweepstakes, I encourage you to visit the official website of the event at:  www.wix.com/lancejp/patriot for more information.  There you will find documents, links, a promo video, and a whole lot more.  By the way, the entire event is free and you have the opportunity to win a $25 Restaurants.com E-Gift Certificate if you participate.  I hope you’ll join us with that.  Also, If you would like to have the opportunity to share your thoughts with me and all the viewers/readers of Lance Pisowicz Online, you can leave me a message/reply that might even be shared on the show, be sure to head over to:  http://lponline.wufoo.com/forms/z7x3k7/ to take part in that.

I hope you have enjoyed our broadcast tonight, as much as I have.  Thanks again, and God bless you all.  See you Sunday!

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Ramifications and Results

It’s Friday and this is “What’s Wrong With Washington”.  I am Lance Pisowicz.  I had a great time at the waterpark today, and I hope you enjoyed your day as well.  Tonight we are finally returning to our normal presentation with several topics that have been important in the news over the past few weeks.  I have just a couple of reminders before we begin.  Please do check out my website, Lance Pisowicz Online (www.wix.com/lancejp/online).  Also become a subscriber of my Youtube Channel (www.youtube.com/lancejp/online), like my Facebook (www.facebook.com/lancepisowicz), or follow me on Twitter (www.twitter.com/lancejponline).  You can also subscribe to my blogs on blogger (www.wrongwithwashington.blogspot.com and www.lancesweeklywalk.blogspot.com).  It would be a pleasure for me and everyone else involved with Lance Pisowicz Online if you would join us there sometime.

As I said earlier, we are returning to our normal blog tonight now that it is summer and everything seems to have calmed down just a little bit.  Most of you already know this, but just for the record:  I will not be holding any weekly polls while the Ultimate Patriot Competition and Sweepstakes in the months of June and July.  For those of you who do not know what the Ultimate Patriot event is, be sure to pay extra attention at the end of the program for details regarding it all.

One of the greatest news stories of this past week was the results in Wisconsin’s Governor Recall Election.  As many of you are aware, Governor Scott Walker was able to retain his position as governor of Wisconsin.  He won a 53% majority over the Democratic challenger, Scott Barrett’s 46%.1  But the question remains:  what does this mean for the main election in November?

A loss in Wisconsin on Tuesday would not have devastated the Republicans, but it would have given bad ramifications in regards to what direction the state would go in the presidential election.  On the other hand, the fact that Walker was able to maintain his position after being elected in the GOP mass victories in 2010, gives a sign that 2012 may just be a little more like two years ago, than how things were four years ago.

Wisconsin played a crucial role in electing President Obama in 2008 and losing the state’s ten electoral votes this time around might be another element capable of tipping the scale in favor of Mitt Romney.

The president may have even less support for him than he anticipated, not just in Wisconsin but around the country as well.  Fox News now reports that 51% of Americans disapprove of the President’s performance, with 45% approving and 4% undecided.2


That leads me to my next topic for tonight.  The reports on incoming funds for each presidential candidate in the month of May have been released.  Mitt Romney has managed to raise $76.8 million while Barack Obama raised $60 million.3  My initial though was excitement.  Conservatives, Independents, and fed-up Democrats alike have come together to make a change in November.  However, when I considered the fact that President Obama still raised $16.4 million more than he raised in April and the fact that he has outpaced Romney in just about every other month of the campaign gave me another thought - the fight has just begun.  Take into account that Mitt did not have combined support in the past months that he now has.  Although Romney was the presumed candidate in April, Americans were still just beginning to rally around him.  Also consider the fact that Obama had raised $196.9 million by the end of March, while Romney had just $87.5 million.4  However, the month of May attests that America might just be taken back, even if Mitt Romney and his supporters have to work twice as hard.

Finally, we conclude tonight to take a look at something that was very big in the news last week.  Many of you heard about the movement to nationally ban sex-selective abortions after several videos exposed the details in how Planned Parenthood is dealing with patients who request such atrocities.  Bipartisan cooperation has led to  77% of Americans to support laws that would ban abortions based on gender.5  However, the most recent attempt to ban this practice failed after Congress was unable to gain the necessary two-thirds majority to make it law.  A vote of 246-146 was in favor of the bill, with twenty Democrats voting in favor of it and seven Republicans voting against it.6  Unfortunately it was not enough to make it the “law of the land.”

What I think is most understood about this proposition and the concept of practicing sex-selective abortions, is the fact that it is a completely separate issue from the concept of abortion itself.  Personally I am Pro-Life, but even if I were Pro-Choice I would recognize the fact that choosing whether or not one should have a child based on whether it will be a boy or a girl is the original form of discrimination.  When the left accuses Republicans of having a “war on women” they are being as hypocritical as humanly possible by conducting their “war on little women”.  I am a person who believes everyone deserves an equal opportunity to life, but what if there was a way to determine whether a child would be heterosexual or homosexual before birth, the same people who condone or even advocate sex-selective abortions would have a fit if we were to condone sexual orientation-based abortions.  Obviously both of these propositions are ridiculous, but the fact is that one of them is currently legal in nearly every state in the nation.  While the nation is much more divided on the issue of abortion as a whole, a clear majority, nearly eight out of ten Americans believe that sex-based abortions are discriminatory.

This concludes our three mini-subjects for tonight, but I do have several closing announcements.  For those of you wondering about the Ultimate Patriot competition and sweepstakes, I encourage you to visit the official website of the event at:  www.wix.com/lancejp/patriot for more information.  There you will find documents, links, a promo video, and a whole lot more.  By the way, the entire event is free and you have the opportunity to win a $25 Restaurants.com E-Gift Certificate if you participate.  I hope you’ll join us with that.  Also, If you would like to have the opportunity to share your thoughts with me and all the viewers/readers of Lance Pisowicz Online, you can leave me a message/reply that might even be shared on the show, be sure to head over to:  http://lponline.wufoo.com/forms/z7x3k7/ to take part in that.

I hope you have enjoyed our broadcast tonight, as much as I have.  Thanks again, and God bless you all.  See you Sunday!



Sources:

  1. http://nbcpolitics.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/05/12074595-walker-emerges-victorious-in-wisconsin-recall?lite&gt1=43001
  2. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/index.html
  3. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/07/romney-raised-77-million-in-may-outperforming-obama-effort-for-first-time/
  4. http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance
  5. http://www.lifenews.com/2012/05/21/poll-77-support-laws-banning-sex-selection-abortions/
  6. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/31/sex-selection-abortion-vote-fails-house-gop_n_1559827.html

Friday, June 1, 2012

Summer is Finally Here!

Happy Friday!  I am Lance Pisowicz and this is “What’s Wrong With Washington.  It is my first day of summer and I am looking forward to a lot of great things coming in the next few months.  This evening we are going to take a look at the results of our voting polls and analyze that issue a bit.  I will also fill you in on all the details in regards to the Ultimate Patriot competition and sweepstakes and hopefully answer any questions you might have about the event. Before we begin I have just a couple of reminders before we begin.  Please do check out my website, Lance Pisowicz Online (www.wix.com/lancejp/online).  Also become a subscriber of my Youtube Channel (www.youtube.com/user/lancejponline), like my Facebook (www.facebook.com/lancepisowicz), or follow me on Twitter (www.twitter.com/lancejponline).  You can also subscribe to my blogs on blogger (www.wrongwithwashington.blogspot.com and www.lancesweeklywalk.blogspot.com).  Be sure to join me in all of these locations.  They truly are great locations to connect with other Americans who love their country.

To begin this evening’s show I will share the results in last week’s poll.  Our topic was whether or not English should be declared the national language of the United States.  This past week we had our best turnout in quite a while.  We had more than twice the number of voters as last week.  Keep it up you guys!  Over 90% of you supported the proposal to declare English the national language.  A little over 6% of you said no to the national language idea and about 3% of you are still undecided.  Once again, I thank you for all of the responses this week!  I hope you plan on voting in the Ultimate Patriot competition and sweepstakes, not only to have your voice heard but also to have a chance to win a $25 Restaurants.com E-Gift Certificate.  I’ll have more on that in a few minutes.  For now, let’s take a deeper look at our results from this week.

Obviously many of us think alike when it comes to this issue.  For those of you who voted no, I appreciate your responses as well.  I would also encourage you all, regardless of what you voted to share future weekly polls with your friends.  The more people we have voting, the better we are representing the entire population.

As far as the issue on whether or not English should be declared the national language, I have three brief points to make.  Next week I want to take an in depth look at some more heated issues, since finals this week kept me from preparing a normal length blog.

One of the greatest reasons, I advocate that English be made the national language is the fact that twenty-eight of the states as well as five American territories have English as either the sole or one of the primary languages.1  English is the sole primary language in twenty-seven states and shares the honor with Hawaiian in the state of Hawaii.

It seems like a shame if an American territory shows more patriotism than a state, but that’s just me.  Twenty-three states apparently disagree with me for one reason or another.  Surprisingly only two states in the south and southwestern United States do not have English as their official language.  Nearly all of the states without English as their official language are in the Northeastern United States.  In fact, of the thirteen original colonies, just four (Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia) have given English such a distinction.  So why is there such a lack of patriotism among some of our eldest states?

One can argue that ethnic diversity in states such as New York play a role, but even California and Florida, very ethnically diverse states themselves, have made English their official language.

By making English the official language we are not outlawing other languages.  We are simply honoring our history and preserving an element of American culture that has been around for hundreds of years.

In response to a question I was recently asked about why we wouldn’t make a Native American language the national language, I have several things to say.  Who founded the United States of America?  Obviously, the simple answer is the English.  But why didn’t they honor Native American culture and learn their language when they came to the New World?  Well the answer to that is quite simple.  The Native American culture was a very diverse and complicated one to understand.  In addition to that element, there is the aspect that many Native American cultures did not hold the same values that our nation was founded on. 

The settlers who left Europe and other parts of the world did something revolutionary.  They set out to establish a nation founded on the principles of equality, freedom, and justice for all.  Since then, people from all nations have come to America under that contract:  to receive all of the benefits of this great land, but at the same time assimilate into its cultural pool.  That is what has created the great melting pot of a nation we are today.  In 2007, only about 4.5 million people in the United States could not speak English at all.  By making English the official language, a source of encouragement would be provided to all people living in America, to learn her language.  Just like when you visit someone’s house or even move in with them, you don’t come in and make the rules yourself.  You follow their rules.  Theodore Roosevelt did not take very kindly to people living in America who refused to learn English and show full loyalty to the United States in this quote:

"Every immigrant who comes here should be required within five years to learn English or leave the country."

States with other rich and widespread cultural traditions, such as Hawaii should be able to make other languages official as well, but if a state is a part of the union, it should honor its established and most common language:  English.

To conclude with tonight, I promised I would share all the info I have on the Ultimate Patriot competition and sweepstakes for this summer.  For those of you wondering what I am talking about, almost a month ago I asked you all on Twitter who you thought the “ultimate patriot” was.  I got a great mix of responses, and included quite a few of them in the list of sixty-four nominees I established.  Now, since today is June 1st I am revealing the event to you all in full.  From now through July 27th you will have the opportunity to make your voice heard by voting in various surveys on who the ultimate patriot is.  It’s really simple to do.  To begin, just visit the official headquarters of the Ultimate Patriot event at www.wix.com/lancejp/patriot or click on the logo that will appear in the photo show on Lance Pisowicz Online (www.wix.com/lancejp/online).  I will also be posting the links to vote in each of the surveys on Twitter and Facebook.  Once you are on the Ultimate Patriot headquarters webpage, just click on the white circle with the yellow word “vote” on it to be taken to the current survey.  You can vote once per computer in each survey of the event.

The event itself is broken into different rounds and groups.  A round is just like an March Madness NCAA Tournament round.  The round of 64 nominees will have 32 “match-ups” where you will pick who the greater patriot is in each “match-up.”  The next round, the round of 32 will have 16 “match-ups” and so on.  The larger rounds are broken into what I call groups, where you will vote on different sections of the bracket in each group.  To fully understand what I mean by the event setup, I would advise you to download either the PDF or Microsoft Excel document that says “Updated Bracket” from www.wix.com/lancejp/patriot.  You can also find out how your favorite patriot might win the entire event.

If all of this seems like a lot, I understand.  That is why I am suspending the weekly polls until this event concludes at the end of July.  But to make this event a little sweeter for you all, I am overseeing a sweepstakes event that runs in conjunction with the Ultimate Patriot competition.  For every survey you complete you receive one chance in a random drawing to receive a $25 Restaurants.com E-Gift Certificate.  It’s a nice gesture and a way for me to say thank you for all of the support you all have shown me these past few months.

If you have any questions about the event, I tried to cover everything at www.wix.com/lancejp/patriot but I am available to answer any more questions you may have via Twitter or my email, lpisowicz@usa.com.

That’s all the time we have for tonight.  Thank you for joining me on “What’s Wrong With Washington”.  I will see you on Sunday with “Lance’s Weekly Walk.” 

I hope you have enjoyed our broadcast tonight, as much as I have.  Thanks again, and God bless you all.  See you Sunday!



Sources:

  1. http://www.us-english.org/view/13
  2. http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/acs-12.pdf

Friday, May 25, 2012

Summer Here We Come!

Happy Friday and this is “What’s Wrong With Washington” and I am Lance Pisowicz.  Tonight I unfortunately will not have a normal length blog nor will I post a video.  Instead, I have a few elements of exciting news to announce and a this past week’s poll results to break down, but first I have a couple of reminders for you all.  Please do check out my website, Lance Pisowicz Online (www.wix.com/lancejp/online).  Also become a subscriber of my Youtube Channel (www.youtube.com/user/lancejponline), like my Facebook (www.facebook.com/lancepisowicz), or follow me on Twitter (www.twitter.com/lancejponline).  You can also subscribe to my blogs on blogger (www.wrongwithwashington.blogspot.com and www.lancesweeklywalk.blogspot.com).  Be sure to join me in all of these locations.  They truly are great locations to connect with other Americans who love their country.

You must forgive me this week as I will not have my normal set for our Friday presentation.  I am now a little less than halfway through my final exams (I’ve taken 3 of 8) and summer is just around the corner.  With that being said, there are a few things I found like to bring to your attention.  I am preparing a special edition of “Lance’s Weekly Walk” for Sunday similar to what we did for Mother’s Day.  Again I will not be able to prepare a full length blog due to final exams.  I do plan to return with full length blogs and videos next weekend, my first of the summer.  I hope to offer some exciting new topics as well as dig deeper into the more established ones.

Secondly, for those of you who remember my question from a couple of weeks ago regarding who you thought was/is the “Ultimate Patriot”, that competition will begin early this summer.  I am still finalizing many of the unique elements about this event, but it will occur over June and July this summer.  It will pit sixty-four American patriots from unique backgrounds and walks of life against one another for the title of “Ultimate Patriot”.  Many of the people who made the list, I feel are awesome American role models, but I have included some that were not in my top sixty-four, because I feel they represent the nation’s top sixty-four.  The event will occur in tournament format, much like the NCAA Basketball Tournaments if any of you have watched those or filled out a bracket.  You will have the opportunity to select which patriot advances in each matchup in order to determine the eventual champion.  I even have a few surprises to come with this, so stay tuned.  Be sure to make your voice heard in the mega-competition when it is released early this summer.

Finally I will reveal our results from this week’s poll.  Our voter turnout was up from last week which was nice to see. Last week I asked who the United States greatest foreign ally should be.  The results were quite intriguing.  An even 50% of you selected Israel as our greatest ally, while a little over 21% of you chose the United Kingdom.  Just over 14% said India should be our best friend, while about 7% of you chose Japan.  Another 7% selected another country not included in our poll.  Thanks again for voting.

Don’t forget you can vote in this week’s poll by visiting http://poll.fm/3q5sb.  Tell us whether you think English should be declared the national language or not.  Polls close at 3 PM EDT on Thursday so be sure to vote while you can.  You can vote once every 24 hours, so be sure to make your voice heard!  Thanks again for joining me again tonight.  I will see you with the Memorial Day special edition of “Lance’s Weekly Walk” on Sunday.  God bless you all and have a great but safe weekend!

Friday, May 18, 2012

A Crossroads

It’s Friday and this is “What’s Wrong With Washington”.  I am Lance Pisowicz.  This evening we are going to return our focus to an issue that I know has all of you very concerned.  Exactly what does the federal government’s growth in power mean to you?  I have just a couple of reminders before we begin.  Please do check out my website, Lance Pisowicz Online (www.wix.com/lancejp/online).  Also become a subscriber of my Youtube Channel (www.youtube.com/user/lancejponline), like my Facebook (www.facebook.com/lancepisowicz), or follow me on Twitter (www.twitter.com/lancejponline).  You can also subscribe to my blogs on blogger (www.wrongwithwashington.blogspot.com and www.lancesweeklywalk.blogspot.com).  Be sure to join me in all of these locations.  They truly are great locations to connect with other Americans who love their country.

Now, I will reveal the results in last week’s poll.  Our topic was whether or not you believed that the federal government has grown too powerful.  Once again I appreciate all of the responses.  Hopefully we can see even more next time.  75% of you said you were believed the federal government has gained too much power, while 25% of you said it has not gained too much power.  I was very intrigued by the results, and tonight we will examine this topic a bit more.  Thanks again; I hope you will vote again this week!  As always we have a jam-packed show, so let’s begin!

I’ll begin tonight with what I would consider to be sort of a “mini-topic”.  It’s something that has been occupying much of the airtime on the major news networks, so I thought I would just set the record straight.

As many of you are aware, last week President Obama came out and said, “Same-sex couples should be able to get married.”  Okay, thanks for your input Mr. President, but is that really your call in the position you’re in?

Personally I believe marriage is between one man and one woman but I realize just how divided our nation is on the issue.  In 2009, a Gallup Poll found that 57% of Americans opposed Same-Sex Marriage, while 40% supported it.3  This was a drop in six percentage points, when 46% of Americans supported Same-Sex Marriage in 2007.  So is now really the time to “divide the house” once again?

The last time I checked, the rights to Marriage laws were reserved to the states, and if you really wanted to make a change, you should have run for Governor of Illinois.  At least you probably wouldn’t have tried to sell a Senate seat.

Now, that is not to say that Marriage laws cannot become a federally ordained right.  It would require an amendment to the Constitution.  To do this we would either need a proposition by Congress or a national convention requested by at least two-thirds of the state legislatures.1  The national convention has been attempted twice but has never succeeded.  Even if the convention happened, 38 states would need to approve the amendment.  If we went the Congress route, there would need to be a two-thirds major in both the Senate and House of Representatives.  Considering how divided Congress is today and the extreme requirements for amending by convention, I would say there is no way a Constitutional Amendment is going to happen for this during Obama’s presidency (win or lose in November) or anytime soon after that.  So what was the President’s purpose behind this “announcement”?

It was merely an attempt to reinvigorate a base support group that got him elected in 2008.  President Obama felt as if he had neglected the advocates of Same-Sex Marriage, so he felt inclined to come out and make a statement.  But it goes further than that.  The statement was also a fundraising tactic, which brought in tens of millions of dollars from Same-Sex Marriage advocates.

Meanwhile Mitt Romney has attempted to remain out of the fray, and the results have been rewarding thus far.  A recent poll by CBS News/New York Times reports that Romney now leads Obama 49-46, and the president has lost 5 percentage points each among women, moderates, and independents respectively.  Although, I realize unseating an incumbent is very difficult, I understand that Mitt Romney is right.  The issue in the hearts and souls of the American people right now, by and large, is not a social one but an economic one.  Just like in 2008, the very issue that elected Barack Obama threatens to destroy him - the economy.  Americans are concerned with whether or not they will have a job next month, how they will repay their student loans when they finish school, or what their children’s futures will hold.

If you don’t believe me, let’s lead into my next topic, with a glimpse into a possible future for the world.  Let’s say President Obama is reelected.  The federal government continues to expand, new taxes suffocate American business and industry, and the already towering debt to China and other foreign nations grows even larger.  We are now going to jump eighteen years into the future with a look at what the world might be like.

Whether President Obama’s policies take us down a path to socialism or not, one thing is for certain.  If his policies don’t, our debt will.  It all comes down to dollars and cents.

Many foreign nations, in particular China, have been loaning the United States government money for years.  Where does China get the money to do so?  Their exponentially growing industries are controlled by the government because it is a Communist state. 

So unlike when American industries flourish on a global scale, the Chinese government not only benefits in a small way (like the U.S. does with taxes) but reaping nearly all of the bounties brought from international trade.

As I stated earlier, with that money they are loaning the United States over 1 trillion dollars.4  This is about 8% of the nearly 15 trillion dollars of American debt.

Just like a bank essentially owns a home until the mortage is paid, China has a great deal of influence in the United States.  In its present state, that influence is somewhat passive (although one could make a case otherwise), but that influence will only grow more intrusive and pervasive the more we owe and the longer we owe it.

Just like with a house or a car, if a person does not pay their loan back, they are given several warnings that the bank will seize the property.  Although there are codes of ethics regarding influence in other nations, China will essentially be in the driver’s seat if we do not do something fast.

The Chinese are not really to blame for the predicament we find ourselves in.  We have essentially brought this on ourselves.  One should never owe a debt, monetary or personal favor to anyone who does not have his best interest in mind.  Not only is China another country, but by and large, they have a very different philosophy in regards to how a nation should be governed and where the common man fits in.

How have we brought this problem on ourselves?  The answer is found in the fact that we have forgotten our history and abandoned our principles.  As a nation, we seem to have forgotten what our values are.  We formed this nation because we felt government had become apathetic to us and had intruded on our lives.  The same is true today.  A federal healthcare system that will cost hundreds of billions of dollars, a failed stimulus package, among other programs designed to supposedly help the public have stripped away many of the freedoms which we hold dear.  In the meantime, we seem to sink further and further into debt, and nobody seems to know how to solve the problem.

America now finds herself at a crossroads.  We can either take the path down the road to socialism and more government pervasion, or we can choose to go restore our nation to its former glory with a freer society that would make the founders proud.  It’s our choice.

Before we conclude this evening I have a message from one of you guys that I wanted to share.

“What's wrong with Washington? For the past 10 or 15 years, nothing important has been accomplished in Washington. So, Washington D.C. is just as dead as President Washington himself.

I think to start; we should jump into Natural gas production & distribution to power our cars. Can you imagine how many people that would employ? ALL U.S. JOBS.”

Steven Fisher
Bristol, PA

If you would like to possibly have a message/reply shared on the show, be sure to leave us one at: http://lponline.wufoo.com/forms/z7x3k7/.

That’s all the time we have for tonight.  Thank you for joining me on “What’s Wrong With Washington”.  I will see you on Sunday with “Lance’s Weekly Walk.” 

This week our poll question asks you who should be the United States’ greatest foreign ally.  Be sure to tell us who you think America’s greatest friend is at:  http://poll.fm/3prne.  You can also access this poll and many other features through Lance Pisowicz Online, www.wix.com/lancejp/online

I hope you have enjoyed our broadcast tonight, as much as I have.  Thanks again, and God bless you all.  See you Sunday!



Sources:

  1. http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution/
  2. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/15/alarm-grows-among-dems-about-obamas-chances/
  3. http://www.gallup.com/poll/118378/Majority-Americans-Continue-Oppose-Gay-Marriage.aspx
  4. http://www.davemanuel.com/so-how-much-money-does-the-us-owe-to-china-85/

Friday, May 11, 2012

Taking a Stand

Happy Friday!  This is “What’s Wrong With Washington” and I am Lance Pisowicz.  Tonight we are going to take a look at two of the more “touchy” issues are nation is facing today.  Neither issue is as immediate as the economy nor the direction government is headed in, but they are important topics and cannot be ignored.  Before we get to that, please do check out my website, Lance Pisowicz Online (www.wix.com/lancejp/online).  Also become a subscriber of my Youtube Channel (www.youtube.com/user/lancejponline), like my Facebook (www.facebook.com/lancepisowicz), or follow me on Twitter (www.twitter.com/lancejponline).  You can also subscribe to my blogs on blogger (www.wrongwithwashington.blogspot.com and www.lancesweeklywalk.blogspot.com).  Be sure to join me in all of these locations as we collaborate on ideas to take back our nation.

Before I move on to the two controversial issues we will cover, I will reveal the results in the Abortion poll.  I understand this was a very emotional topic for many of you, and I appreciate all of the responses.  We had another great turnout this week.  85.71% of you said you were Pro-Life, while 14.29% of you said you were Pro-Choice.  As I said, it appears that just about everyone has an opinion on this issue one way or the other.  Thanks again; I hope you will vote again next week!  There are two major issues that I would like to get to, so let’s get going.

Often on “What’s Wrong With Washington” we point out all of the scandals occurring in D.C. as well as discuss how to fix the economy or government itself.  Today I thought it was important for us to take a look at some issues that are not the most glamorous.  They never have unanimous support, and often many politicians dodge them fearing “political suicide.”  However, it takes a true man of character to stand up for what he believes in, and occasionally I feel compelled to do so.

As you probably guessed from our poll topic, tonight I am going to break down the issue of abortion.  I understand nearly all of you have a very strong belief set in regard to this issue.  After all, the topic has been very heated since abortion was legalized in every state in 1973.1  And to say that the issue was not heated before then would be absolutely false.  In fact, it has been a key issue for many of our entire lives.

So what I will do tonight is present the facts and analyze it all.  According to the National Abortion Federation, the reasoning behind legalizing abortion was to make it safer for the mother and more human to the baby who they were essentially going to kill.2

Since 1973 over 54 million abortions (murders) have been condoned by the United States government.3  In just over 38 years, abortion has killed more people than the Holocaust (11 million)4 and the reign of Joseph Stalin (20 million)5.  I recognize that the Holocaust was only about six years and Stalin’s reign was about thirty years, but this adds up to 31 million murders in about thirty-six years combined.  Remember, there were reportedly 54 million abortions between 1973 and the end of 2011 (about thirty-eight years).

However, those who support abortion or “Pro-Choice” as they call it will claim that the fetus in the mother’s womb is not a living human being.  But here’s what the experts have to say:

“A favorite pro-abortion tactic is to insist that the definition of when life begins is impossible; that the question is a theological or moral or philosophical one, anything but a scientific one.  Fetology makes it undeniably evident that life begins at conception and requires all the protection and safeguards that any of us enjoy.” - Dr. Bernard Nathanson (New York, NY)

“It was not until I was pregnant myself that I began to really examine my feelings about the moral aspects of abortion. It had taken over a year for me to become pregnant with my daughter. The first time I saw the tiny little flicker of her heartbeat on an ultrasound screen I fell completely in love with her. I finally had to come to terms with the fact that the only thing that made my daughter any different than all those tiny babies I had terminated was the fact that I wanted her. It was as if the scales fell from my eyes and I was at last able to see what I had not allowed myself to see in all those years of doing terminations.” - Dr. Yvonne Moore (Memphis, TN)

“When you looked at an ultrasound, there was no mistaking that this was a baby. Ladies who came in for mid-trimester (four to six months of pregnancy) abortions were shielded from the images. Several nurses quit. They would bond with the baby they saw on the screen; they couldn't take it.” - Dr. Joseph Randall (Atlanta, GA)

All three of these doctors’ testimonies are from TeenBreaks.com.6  There are also several others there worth reading as well.

If these testimonies do not prove that life begins at the moment of conception, then I must ask what do some people (often the Left) believe is true?  Do they believe in scientific facts or do they rely on hearsay.  Often times they like to accuse Republicans of not being based on facts, when in fact they do it themselves on other issues.  If a doctor who was once an abortionist and fervent Pro-Choice supporter comes out and says abortion is in fact murder, and they chose not to believe him, then who’s to say that their environmentalist so-called “experts” are correct about global warming?

It really is quite perplexing when there are people in society who advocate the rights of the environment or animals yet they turn a blind-eye to the systematic murder of millions of human beings.  There is nothing wrong with wanting to take care of this great environment God has given us or treat the animals we are supposed to look after with respect, but when they become more important than mankind, something is clearly wrong.

In the United States we believe it is wrong to deny anyone their rights, but by condoning abortion we are denying human infants their rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

I respect the rights of women, and I believe we need laws to protect them from rape and being left with children they have to support themselves.  I applaud the government on their child support laws they have passed in recent years to not only help the mothers but also the children they will attempt to raise.  I also see domestic adoption as a great solution to this issue.  There are millions of American couples who want to become parents who cannot have children of their own who are forced to adopt internationally because there are very few alternatives in the United States.

I also understand many women would prefer to avoid the pregnancy and the pains of childbirth all together, and if another human life were not at stake I would fully support them on this.  However, as my Business Law teacher said, “Your rights stop where another’s rights begin.”

Unfortunately, in theory, the mother has the duty to have the child unless her own life is at stake.

To conclude with this issue, I will quote Ronald Reagan once again.

“Abortion is advocated only by persons who have themselves been born.”

The second key topic I want to highlight tonight is the issue regarding immigration to the United States.  Nearly all of us have some ancestors if not all who immigrated to the United States at one time or another.  For my mother’s family this was mostly during the 1600s and 1700s.  In fact, I even had two ancestors (Thomas Rogers and John Goodman) who signed the Mayflower Compact and founded Plymouth colony.  These ancestors were mainly from England, Scotland, Wales, France, Holland, and eventually some came from Germany and Ireland.  My father’s family has a quite different story.  My grandfather is 100% Polish (hence my last name) and my grandmother was 50% Polish and 50% Hungarian.  The last portion of my family to enter the United States was my grandfather’s mother’s family who immigrated here in 1912.

The truth is, immigration has been and continues to be a very beneficial element of American society when it is overseen and regulated in the right way.  The only part of my family not to immigrant here was my Mohawk (Iroquois) branch from which my 13th great-grandfather was Chief Sachen of the Turtle Clan and his daughter (an unnamed Mohawk princess) married a French settler, Jacques Hertel.

Although my two sides of the family have very different backgrounds, one thing is for certain.  They have struggled greatly to preserve the freedoms we enjoy today, and their triumphs are a result of their tireless work and the grace of God.  Although the political machines of New York and Chicago “kissed up” to my new immigrant ancestors, nothing they did actually improved their lives.  All they managed to do was attempt to create a hostility between the old immigrants and the new immigrants.  The Democratic party has been notorious for its large scale political machines in major cities that attempt to gain support for themselves by “helping out” new immigrants with handouts.

They still seem to have this twisted outlook, that the new immigrants are somehow more important than the old.  The truth is, no matter when your family immigrated here or where they came from, we all deserve equal opportunity.  Not equal treatment regardless of what we do, but the equal opportunity to prosper.  That was how each of my families developed into what they are today.

As I said earlier, legal, regulated immigration is one of the greatest blessings our nation has had.  However, as a nation, it would be wrong for us to condone illegal immigration, no matter where those immigrants come from.  The law is the law, and it is designed to protect our current citizens and new, legal immigrants.

According to Illegal Immigration Statistics, about 11.1 million of the 307 million people living in America are illegal immigrants.7  Although illegal immigrants are not eligible to directly receive welfare,8 they cost Americans about 2.8 million jobs and over $113 billion annually through educational costs for their children and other services provided with taxpayer dollars.9  To put that in perspective, consider that they cost the average American household $1,117 a year directly, not to mention that they take nearly 3 million jobs away from American citizens and legal immigrants.

So what should be done in regards to illegal immigration?  First of all, we must increase the security of our borders.  We must build a stronger, taller wall/fence between our nation and our neighbors (mainly where the illegal entries are occurring must frequently).  The next step is to bring our boys home from Afghanistan once we have stabilized things a little bit more and are able to confidently withdraw and declare victory.  We then can offer a good share of them jobs as border patrol and the rest can return to civilian life.

But the question remains about what to do with illegal immigrants who are already here.  If an illegal immigrant has been convicted of any crime, they need to be deported as soon as possible.  No questions asked, they do not have the right to cost us even more money incarcerating them after they were not supposed to be here in the first place.  The question remains about what to do with any children they might have.  If the child was born here, they are American citizens and are protected under law.  If they choose to stay here, we can assist them temporarily as we seek a responsible, loving American family for them.  If they choose to return with their parent(s) then that is their choice and their right.  For those children who were born outside of the United States, the question becomes, should they be allowed to stay or should they be deported as well?  I believe they should be allowed to stay with the eventual opportunity to become American citizens, if they came to America when they were under the age of eighteen, unless they have committed crimes themselves.

The last thing to consider is what to do with illegal immigrants who have otherwise obeyed the law since they came here.  I believe that they should be given the opportunity to become American citizens after they have proven themselves loyal to this nation and have shown that they can be a valuable asset to it.  We do not need any more “dead-weight” in this country, so any newcomers should not only take from America but give back.

In the coming months and years these issues will continue to heat up.  They are difficult, emotional topics that deal with human beings.  We must be fair to both sides, while still sticking to our core values.  It takes a true man of character to speak on these issues, and I am always happy to see someone stand up for their beliefs, whether I agree with them or not.  In reality, these issues do exist, and just like the issues of slavery or civil rights, there will ultimately be a verdict.  It simply has not come yet.

That’s all the time we have for tonight.  Thank you for joining me on “What’s Wrong With Washington”.  I will see you on Sunday with “Lance’s Weekly Walk.”  Also, be sure to tell me what you think with a message or reply at: http://lponline.wufoo.com/forms/z7x3k7/.  It might be shared on the next show.

This week our poll question is in regards to whether or not the federal government has grown too large or not.  Be sure to tell us who you think at:  http://poll.fm/3p9rl.  You can also access this poll and many other features through Lance Pisowicz Online, www.wix.com/lancejp/online

I hope you have enjoyed our broadcast tonight, as much as I have.  Thanks again, and God bless you all.  See you Sunday!



Sources:

  1. http://archives.starbulletin.com/2000/03/21/editorial/smyser.html
  2. http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/history_abortion.html
  3. http://www.christianliferesources.com/article/u-s-abortion-statistics-by-year-1973-current-1042
  4. http://www.holocaustforgotten.com/Newsletter.htm
  5. http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/stalin.html
  6. http://www.teenbreaks.com/abortion/abortiondoctors.cfm
  7. http://www.illegalimmigrationstatistics.org/
  8. http://blog.chron.com/immigration/2008/01/illegal-immigrants-on-welfare-fact-or-fiction/
  9. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/07/02/immigration-costs-fair-amnesty-educations-costs-reform/